By Scott Lee
The rise of gene therapy technologies and the human genome project has made the idea of playing God feasible. The ability to manipulate an organism’s genes using biotechnology has opened up countless doors for medical science, such as using gene therapy to treat existing diseases. But when it comes to making genetic enhancements beyond what is ‘natural’ to the human body, a host of ethical and constitutional issues come to the fore. Suppose two parents opt to genetically enhance their child before birth to affect her physical traits like beauty, personality characteristics like charisma, or mental capabilities such as creativity and memory. Generally, the law has tried to preserve parents’ reproductive rights, but this may change in the near future as society continues to chart new and murky legal territories. Would the US Constitution presumptively protect parents’ right to genetic enhancement?

